Use case · LLMs and RAG
Most leaks into LLMs don't start in production. They start when someone indexes a folder of real contracts to try a RAG prototype, pastes a real ticket into a prompt, or fine-tunes on last year's support logs. Here is how to stop that at the source.
of files uploaded to generative AI tools contained personal or card data, and about 18% of enterprise employees paste data into those tools.
LayerX Enterprise AI and SaaS Data Security Report 2025, via eSecurity Planet
Six steps
Formats: RAG and agent data, documents, chats and tickets.
It helps, but it has to catch every leak in every answer. Data that never entered the index or the training set can't leak at all. Use both, and treat the data side as the one you fully control.
Yes, and realistic replacements work better than placeholder tags, because the model learns from text that still reads naturally.
A unique, fake value planted in your data, such as a never-issued SSN. If it ever shows up in an output or a log, you know exactly which source leaked.
Documents and text use the same policies, the same engine and the same deployment as these results.
Published results from database and synthetic data work on the Synthesized platform.
Masked and synthetic documents, prepared in your environment, ready to index. Start with 50 of your documents, in your environment, in 48 hours, for a fixed fee.